On 9/29/21 5:27 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2021-Sep-29, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>>> The relevant info seems to be
>>>
>>> # Running: pg_basebackup -D
/home/pgrunner/bf/root/REL_14_STABLE/pgsql.build/src/test/recovery/tmp_check/t_026_overwrite_contrecord_primary2_data/backup/backup
-h127.0.0.1 -p 59502 --checkpoint fast --no-sync
>>> pg_basebackup: error: connection to server at "127.0.0.1", port 59502 failed: FATAL: no pg_hba.conf entry for
replicationconnection from host "127.0.0.1", user "pgrunner", no encryption
>>> Bail out! system pg_basebackup failed
>>>
>>> which looks like a pretty straightforward bogus-connection-configuration
>>> problem, except why wouldn't other BF members show it?
>> This:
>>
>> # Second test: a standby that receives WAL via archive/restore commands.
>> $node = PostgresNode->new('primary2');
>> $node->init(
>> has_archiving => 1,
>> extra => ['--wal-segsize=1']);
>>
>> doesn't have "allows_streaming => 1".
> Hmm, but I omitted allows_streaming on purpose -- I only wanted
> archiving, not streaming. I understand that your point is that
> set_replication_conf is not called unless allows_streaming is set.
>
> So, do we take the stance that we have no right to expect pg_basebackup
> to work if we didn't pass allow_streaming => 1? If so, the fix is to
> add it. But my preferred fix would be to call set_replication_conf if
> either allows_streaming or has_archiving are given.
>
>
> Another easy fix would be to call $primary2->set_replication_conf in the
> test file, but then you'd complain that that's supposed to be an
> internal method :-)
It claims that but it's also used here:
src/bin/pg_basebackup/t/010_pg_basebackup.pl
(Also, good perl style would start purely internal method names with an
underscore.)
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
