Re: [ADMIN] SRPM for 8.0.0 beta? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joe Conway
Subject Re: [ADMIN] SRPM for 8.0.0 beta?
Date
Msg-id 4124DF05.8060106@joeconway.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [ADMIN] SRPM for 8.0.0 beta?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
>
>>On that, note that I specifically removed jdbc and tcl options from the
>>spec file because the 8.0.0 release notes said they were removed from
>>the distribution. I suppose at lease jdbc should be put back? It didn't
>>seem right to include the 7.4 jdbc jars in the 8.0 source rpm, and I
>>wasn't sure where to get the equivalent of 8.0.0beta1 jdbc jar files (if
>>such a thing even exists).
>
> What I've done so far is just to grab the latest stable release from
> jdbc.postgresql.org.  Using jars as part of the SRPM is pretty ugly,
> I agree.  There are some other Red Hat folk who have promised to look
> into getting JDBC built from source instead, but it's not high priority.
>

OK, done. Version 4 of the 8.0.0beta1 srpm (and the fc1/fc2 binary rpms)
is available here:
   http://www.joeconway.com/postgresql-8.0.0beta1/

Joe

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: 7.4.3 & 8.0.0beta1 + Solaris 9: default pg_hba.conf
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 7.4.3 & 8.0.0beta1 + Solaris 9: default pg_hba.conf breaks