Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance
Date
Msg-id 4123.1272214318@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> On Sun, 2010-04-25 at 11:50 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> This needs a redesign before it can be considered committable.  I don't
>> really care whether it makes things faster; it's too complicated and too
>> poorly documented to be maintainable.

> There are more than 60 lines of header comment explaining in detail how
> this works, with a full algorithmic analysis. The remaining code is
> commented to project standards, with easily more than 100 lines of
> comments. 

If the comments were correct, I wouldn't be complaining.  They're
misleading or outright wrong on many points.  In particular, I don't
think you actually understand the weak-memory-ordering issue, because
the comments about that are entirely wrong.  I don't think they are
adequate on other points either --- for example, I now understand why my
complaint of a few minutes ago about KnownAssignedXidsValid is wrong,
but the comments certainly didn't help me on that.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance