> There are MANY companies (too
> many to list...and the techdocs site hardly covers them all) but if
> giving props to companies that provide support to the community in IRC,
Actually no, you can list them on less than two hands. There are MANY
companies yes, but there are only a few that contribute at the level
that I am talking about.
SRA - Bruce/Tatsuo - Core and MultiByte
Fujitsu - TableSpaces and a programmer sponsor
RedHat - Tom Lane - Enough said.
Afilias - Jan, Andrew (and one other I don't recall)
Command Prompt - MySelf (Editor N Chief), Sergey and all the code we
have already hashed over
HUB/PGSQL - Marc -- bandwidth, server resources
Agliodbs - JoshB -- Advocacy and Core
If I missed a company I apologize.
> mailing lists, etc... the press release would just be a bunch of names
> of companies and individuals. So, I don't see where those points were
> going.
And no it wouldn't. I brief blurb, three sentences at the end of a major
release PR. -- Thanks to: <small list>
> I don't see a problem mentioning commercial companies that generate code
> to the community project. That makes perfect sense. If an entity
> (corporation) or an individual they should get the same type of
> appreciation.
>
> However, if an individual builds plugin xyz and keeps it for themselves
> (proprietary), I don't see where the obligation of the community is to
> mention such plugin in their press release. (but mentioning the
> individuals/entities that donated code to the community project should
> be mentioned for obvious reasons).
Then we are obviously not as opposed you we possibly seemed.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> -Robby
>
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Mammoth PostgreSQL Replicator. Integrated Replication for PostgreSQL
