>
> Yes, but it is not our purpose to promote those beyond what we do on the
> main web page.
>
> Basically, I see you and Marc, both selling commercial replication
> solutions, arguing we shouldn't mention Slony, and everyone else saying
> we should. Are you guys being unbiased in your evaluation of mentioning
> Slony. I don't think your commercial interests should affect your
> opinion in this matter. I am not sure they are, but I have to ask.
I have zero problem mentioning Slony. I am just advocating being fair to
other products/projects in the same vein.
>
>>Why shouldn't a PostgreSQL press release then mention closed source
>>applications?
>
>
> Why should we if we have an open source version that is as good?
Because "as good" is arbitrary. Slony is a very different beast than
replicator. I don't believe you could quantify whether either is better
than the other because they serve very different needs.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Mammoth PostgreSQL Replicator. Integrated Replication for PostgreSQL
