The other tablespace problem is if you drop a tablespace that schema in
another db uses, it's broken still I think.
Chris
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Where are we on this?
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
>>Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
>>
>>>>Yeah, those are all bug fixes and okay for post-beta I think. But which
>>>>two tablespace failures are you thinking of exactly? The last couple
>>>>weeks have been a bit of a blur for me...
>>
>>>http://groups.google.com.au/groups?q=tablespaces+group:comp.databases.postgresql.hackers&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&group=comp.databases.postgresql.hackers&scoring=d&selm=Pine.LNX.4.58.0407281411470.17889%40linuxworld.com.au&rnum=4
>>
>>Okay, this is a the-error-message-could-be-better gripe. Fair enough,
>>but it's not top of my priority list ...
>>
>>
>>>http://groups.google.com.au/groups?q=tablespaces+group:comp.databases.postgresql.hackers&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&group=comp.databases.postgresql.hackers&scoring=d&selm=4107211C.2050508%40familyhealth.com.au&rnum=5
>>
>>I think the problem here is that we don't have a syntax for saying
>>"my tablespace is the same as my database's default tablespace" or "my
>>tablespace is the same as my schema's default tablespace", when there is
>>an intermediate object (schema or table) that isn't using that
>>tablespace. (Note that "TABLESPACE pg_default" does definitely not mean
>>either of these.)
>>
>>This is fixable with some special syntax but is it worth the trouble?
>>
>> regards, tom lane
>>
>>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>>TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
>>
>
>
