> Hmm...not ALTER INDEX? Now that there's an operation that actually
> modifies an index instead of the table itself, should there be an ALTER
> INDEX? It would be cleaner and more consistent, IMO...
Errr, unlike all the other uses for alter table and friends? ie:
OWNER TO
RENAME TO
SET TABLESPACE
etc.
Lots of things against tables work against indexes and views. Some
stuff for commenting on columns say works on views, composite types and
indexes!
Chris
