Re: pg_dump and sequences (bug ?) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject Re: pg_dump and sequences (bug ?)
Date
Msg-id 4115B0D0.4070103@familyhealth.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_dump and sequences (bug ?)  (strk <strk@keybit.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Using pg_dump from postgresql 7.3.4 I've obtained
> a dump file containing a SEQUENCE SET with no
> corresponding SEQUENCE. I've seen that this is usually
> due to the presence of a table with a 'serial' field,
> but since in this case there is no such table I wonder
> if this is a bug in pg_dump.

Perhaps.  Is there any way you can send me the compressed pg_dump -s 
output of your database?  Is it sensitive info?  How certain are you 
that there is no serial column in your database?

> The only reason I can imagine for this is pg_dump taking
> any sequence whose name  ends in _seq as being associated
> to a table, no matter if that table exists and has a 'serial'
> field. Is this possible ? Shouldn't this kind of dependency
> be coded somehow ?

It is coded somehow and pg_dump in no way treats things that end in _seq 
as being on tables.

My first suspicion is that you must be mistaken, but i would really like 
to see the full pg_dump -s output of your database....

Chris


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: beta time
Next
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump and sequences (bug ?)