Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig
Date
Msg-id 4110.929631918@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig
Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
>>>> Config.h has this.  Does this need to be updated because we can't vacuum
>>>> multi-segment relations?  I have changed it to 7F000000:
>> 
>> Why?  I thought we'd fixed the mdtruncate issue.

> I am told we did not by Hiroshi.  It was news to me too.

Then we'd better fix the underlying problem.  We can't change
RELSEG_SIZE for a minor release, unless you want to give up the
principle of not forcing initdb at minor releases.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] (don't know who else to tell) 6.5 gets build on LinuxPPCR5 but fails a lot of regr. tests
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig