On Aug 23, 2006, at 12:15 , Robert Treat wrote:
> On Thursday 17 August 2006 11:55, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Yeah, that experiment hasn't seemed to work all that well for me
>>> either. Do you have another idea to try, or do you just want to
>>> revert to the old way?
>>
>> Since almost the first day I hacked on PostgreSQL I have been
>> filtering
>> both lists into the same folder, so they pretty much appear to be one
>> and the same to me anyway.
>
> I'm curious, do you combine any other lists like that? I've played
> around
> with that idea (for example, I used to combine webmaster emails,
> pgsql-www,
> and -slaves emails but the slaves traffic was too high so I had to
> split it
> back out). As someone subscribed to a good dozen pg lists, I've
> always been
> quite amazed how much email some of the folks here manage to
> process... I
> suppose I could just chalk it up to a pine vs. gui thing, but I
> suspect there
> are some other tricks people have to make emails more manageable
> (anyone
> combine all pg mail to one folder?)
Reading pg ml mail is relatively high on my list of things I want to
do, so I have it all come into my inbox. However, with other mailing
lists (e.g., ruby-talk and the RoR lists which have the highest
volume of any mailing list I'm subscribed to) I generally have them
routed into their own folder. I usually let lower-volume mailing
lists just end up in my inbox as well
Mail.app on Mac OS X 10.4. I make heavy use of the Mail Act-on[1]
plugin to make further processing of mail easier (such as archiving
to appropriate folders).
Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net
[1](http://www.indev.ca/MailActOn.html)
