Tom Lane wrote:
> So I'm rather inclined to define this behavior as "not a bug". The fact
> that you're complaining seems to indicate that your ffunc scribbles on
> its input, which is bad programming practice in any case. Ordinarily
> I would not think that an ffunc should have any problem with being
> executed repeatedly on the same final transvalue. (If you really want
> to do things that way, maybe your code should take responsibility for
> keeping a flag to execute just once, rather than pushing the cost onto
> everybody.)
>
> Comments anyone?
As someone who makes use of C language aggregate functions, I agree
with your analysis, so long as the fact that an ffunc may be invoked
more than once is well documented, (i.e. an SGML <note> section
might be nice.)
Mike Mascari
