Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Changing the state of data checksums in a running cluster - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tomas Vondra
Subject Re: Changing the state of data checksums in a running cluster
Date
Msg-id 40eb5e02-e715-43d3-a618-f60555bb407c@vondra.me
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Changing the state of data checksums in a running cluster  (Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me>)
Responses Re: Changing the state of data checksums in a running cluster
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
One thing I forgot to mention is the progress reporting only updates
blocks for the FORK_MAIN. It wouldn't be difficult to report blocks for
each fork, but it'd be confusing - the relation counters would remain
the same, but the block counters would change for each fork.

I guess we could report the current_relation/fork, but it seems like an
overkill. The main fork is by far the largest one, so this seems OK.


regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: Clarification on Role Access Rights to Table Indexes
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: table_tuple_lock's snapshot argument