Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery
Date
Msg-id 40FDC9D1.5060705@familyhealth.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery  (Mark Kirkwood <markir@coretech.co.nz>)
List pgsql-patches
I'm in favour of how it is now, so long as the comment is clear.  It's
the Unix Way :)

Chris

> I'd vote for it as a clarity factor too.
>
> Klaus Naumann wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 markw@osdl.org wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> FATAL:  unrecognized configuration parameter "archive_mode"
>>>
>>> Have I missed something since it has been committed?
>>>
>>
>>
>> Yes, Tom has removed this option in favorite of just setting
>> archive_command to a value which then enables the PITR code also.
>>
>> But as I've seen this isn't discussed to the very end currently.
>>
>> My 2ct: I'd prefer to have archive_mode in the config as it really makes
>> clear that this database is archiving. I fear users will not understand
>> that giving a program for archival will also enable the PITR function.
>>
>> Greetings, Klaus
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
>    (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump --clean w/ <= 7.2 server
Next
From: Gavin Sherry
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch for pg_dump: Multiple -t options and new -T