I'd vote for it as a clarity factor too.
Klaus Naumann wrote:
>On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 markw@osdl.org wrote:
>
>
>
>>FATAL: unrecognized configuration parameter "archive_mode"
>>
>>Have I missed something since it has been committed?
>>
>>
>
>Yes, Tom has removed this option in favorite of just setting
>archive_command to a value which then enables the PITR code also.
>
>But as I've seen this isn't discussed to the very end currently.
>
>My 2ct: I'd prefer to have archive_mode in the config as it really makes
>clear that this database is archiving. I fear users will not understand
>that giving a program for archival will also enable the PITR function.
>
>Greetings, Klaus
>
>
>
>
