> I don't think so, but it seems like a much less robust way to do things.
> What happens if you have a failure partway through? For instance
> archive machine dies and loses recent data right after you've rm'd the
> source file. The recommended COPY procedure at least provides some
> breathing room between when you install the data on the archive and when
> the original file is removed.
Well, I tried it in 'cross your fingers' mode and it works, at least:
archive_command = 'rm %p'
:)
Chris
