Re: Assisting developers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joe Conway
Subject Re: Assisting developers
Date
Msg-id 40F4B259.2020703@joeconway.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Assisting developers  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Assisting developers
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>>Well, I note (and I'm not being unkind or anything here) that a lot of 
>>the high level committers we have haven't been so active this release. 
>>Peter and Joe haven't been around much and Jan has been busy with Slony. 

I think this is (in part at least) a reflection of the economy finally 
picking up. Last year this time I had one major project going on -- 
right now I'm juggling about a half dozen or so, any one of which could 
keep me busy full time. Add a couple of OSCON presentations to prepare, 
and several serial disasters/distractions at home (nothing life 
threatening, but all time consuming), and that leaves little-to-no time 
for recreational Postgres coding :(

> The committing isn't really the issue.  It is reviewing and giving
> feedback to developers of complex features.
> 

This is very true. But the fact that I have been able to commit what 
little I have done this release has at least off-loaded some work from 
you Bruce, hasn't it? I'm still green enough though that I'm not in a 
position to review anything too complex -- someone like Tom or Bruce 
would still need to follow up behind me, so it wouldn't really save them 
any time.

Joe




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Is "trust" really a good default?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Assisting developers