Dennis Bjorklund wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, Oliver Jowett wrote:
>
>
>>Savepoint "ROLLBACK TO foo" doesn't invalidate 'foo'. If "SAVEPOINT foo"
>>is 'start new subtransaction foo', "ROLLBACK TO foo" must be 'roll back
>>subtransaction foo and all children; start new subtransaction foo'.
>
>
> If that is all there is, I much rather see this standard interface then a
> pg extension.
So how do you propose supporting simple rollback of a subtransaction? It
seems like an extension regardless of how it's done.
-O
