Re: warning missing - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Hallgren
Subject Re: warning missing
Date
Msg-id 40DB39E0.5030600@mailblocks.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: warning missing  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
Responses Re: warning missing
List pgsql-hackers
Greg,

You don't like Java/C#. I do. There's not much point arguing about it. 
You feel that abstract classes are equivalent to interfaces provided you 
have multiple inheritance, I don't since I'm in favor of a totally clean 
interface/implementation separation.

Now you bring in the Java security model. We could of course discuss 
that and I could argue that MI was rejected for other reasons then the 
one you mention. But I don't think that's going to lead anywhere.

If you feel that C++ and/or Common Lisp is a better OO language then 
Java and C#, then for you it certanly is. For me it's not. Let's just 
respect eachothers standpoint and end the discussion here.

Kind regards,

Thomas Hallgren




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Merlin Moncure"
Date:
Subject: Re: PREPARE and transactions
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Shouldn't we be using openlog's LOG_NOWAIT option?