Re: why no answer? [Fwd: backup and restore just with use - Mailing list pgsql-general

From zuhans@iname.com
Subject Re: why no answer? [Fwd: backup and restore just with use
Date
Msg-id 40D15E93.1060105@iname.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: why no answer? [Fwd: backup and restore just with use  ("Scott Marlowe" <smarlowe@qwest.net>)
Responses Re: why no answer? [Fwd: backup and restore just with use  (Mark Harrison <mh@pixar.com>)
List pgsql-general
hello scott,

this is good news (for me ;-) )!
what kind of client should be available (if i search for a good hoster in near future)?

greetings
hans



Scott Marlowe schrieb:
On Wed, 2004-06-16 at 23:28, zuhans@iname.com wrote: 
hello,

thank you for your short - but informative - answers!
i don't know why this very very important thing isn't implemented by
the jdbc (and other...) driver. it shouldn't only be managable by
those sitting in front of the machine but also via my program to
handle some critical situation in the way i want it to be done (and if
i hoste my webapp somewhere in another continent, i won't be able to
sit in front of the servers console-screen).

to recode pg_dump is far off my time and (maybe) skills. why isn't it
implemented for easier access?   
Well, pg_dump doesn't have to be run on the server, it can be run on a
client halfway around the world from the server and work just fine.


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your     joining column's datatypes do not match
 

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Robin Ericsson
Date:
Subject: Join a varchar array
Next
From: "Henrik Steffen"
Date:
Subject: Re: index with LIKE