Re: Bug in RENAME TO? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject Re: Bug in RENAME TO?
Date
Msg-id 40CBC548.5000701@familyhealth.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bug in RENAME TO?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> d=# update pg_proc set proname = zsubstring(proname,2);
> UPDATE 1727
> 
> So I say there isn't any reason to prohibit renaming functions just
> because they were created at initdb time.  The worst-case scenario
> is you have to rename 'em back.  Likewise for ALTER OWNER.

Again, no reason to stop them doing it via catalog hacking, but really 
good reasons to stop them doing it via SQL commands....

Chris



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug in RENAME TO?
Next
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Date:
Subject: Re: Big feature status