ERROR: duplicate key violates unique constraint - Mailing list pgsql-sql
From | Khairul Azmi |
---|---|
Subject | ERROR: duplicate key violates unique constraint |
Date | |
Msg-id | 40C02D88.3000209@mimos.my Whole thread Raw |
Responses |
Re: ERROR: duplicate key violates unique constraint
|
List | pgsql-sql |
Need help on this problem. I've created two functions. The function should perform a few sql processes. The problem is I got different results when I call the function and when I manually run the sql command. I'm using postgresql 7.4.2. The two functions involved are CREATE TABLE sensor_signature ( sid INTEGER, rh_sign_id INTEGER, PRIMARY KEY (sid,rh_sign_id)); CREATE TABLE rule_header ( rh_sign_id INTEGER, rh_status INTEGER, rh_action VARCHAR(6), proto VARCHAR(10), source_ip VARCHAR(255), source_port VARCHAR(64), dest_ip VARCHAR(255), dest_port VARCHAR(64), dir_operator VARCHAR(64), category VARCHAR(64), rh_revision INTEGER, timestamp timestamp, rh_ord INTEGER, PRIMARY KEY (rh_sign_id)); And my functions are CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION update_sen_sig (integer, varchar) RETURNS integer AS ' DECLARE sign_id alias FOR $1; category alias FOR $2; temp_sid integer; temp_category varchar; T1Cursor refcursor; BEGIN select * into temp_category from get_root_path(category); OPEN T1Cursor FOR SELECT sid FROM conf_categoryWHERE category_name like temp_category and category_status=1; LOOP FETCH T1Cursor INTO temp_sid; EXIT WHEN NOT FOUND; INSERT INTO sensor_signature VALUES (temp_sid, sign_id); RAISE NOTICE '' INSERTINTO sensor_signature VALUES % % '', temp_sid,sign_id; END LOOP; CLOSE T1Cursor; --- COMMIT; RETURN 0; END; ' LANGUAGE 'plpgsql'; CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION rule_header_add (integer,integer,varchar,varchar,varchar,varchar,varchar,varchar,varchar,varchar,integer,integer) RETURNS integer AS ' DECLARE var_f0 alias FOR $1; -- rh_sign_id var_f1 alias FOR $2; -- rh_status var_f2 alias FOR $3; -- rh_action var_f3 alias FOR $4; -- proto var_f4 alias FOR $5; -- source_ip var_f5 alias FOR $6; -- source_port var_f6 alias FOR $7; -- dest_ip var_f7 alias FOR $8; -- dest_port var_f8 alias FOR $9; -- dir_operator var_f9 alias FOR $10; -- category var_f10 alias FOR $11; -- rh_revision var_f11 alias FOR $12; -- rh_ord curtime timestamp; var_temp_RH_ORD integer; BEGIN curtime := current_timestamp; SELECT rh_ord INTO var_temp_RH_ORD FROM rule_header WHERE rh_sign_id = var_f0; IF NOT FOUND THEN INSERT INTO rule_header VALUES (var_f0,var_f1,var_f2,var_f3,var_f4,var_f5,var_f6,var_f7,var_f8,var_f9,var_f10,curtime,var_f11); RAISE NOTICE '' INSERT INTO rule_header VALUES % % % % % % % % % % % % '', var_f0,var_f1,var_f2,var_f3,var_f4,var_f5,var_f6,var_f7,var_f8,var_f9,var_f10,curtime,var_f11; --- select update_sen_sig(var_f0,var_f9); perform update_sen_sig(var_f0,var_f9); RETURN 0; ELSE UPDATE rule_header SET rh_status=var_f1, rh_action=var_f2, proto=var_f3,source_ip=var_f4, source_port=var_f5, dest_ip=var_f6, dest_port=var_f7, dir_operator=var_f8, category=var_f9, rh_revision=var_f10, timestamp=curtime, rh_ord=var_temp_RH_ORD where rh_sign_id=var_f0; DELETE FROM rule_option where rh_sign_id=var_f0; RETURN 1; END IF; END; ' LANGUAGE 'plpgsql'; Issue is cews=> select rule_header_add(999,1,'alert','ip','$EXTERNAL_NET','any','$HOME_NET','any','->','dos.rules',3,0); NOTICE: INSERT INTO rule_header VALUES 999 1 alert ip $EXTERNAL_NET any $HOME_NET any -> dos.rules 3 2004-06-04 15:21:30.448633 NOTICE: INSERT INTO sensor_signature VALUES -1 999 CONTEXT: PL/pgSQL function "rule_header_add" line 26 at perform ERROR: duplicate key violates unique constraint "sensor_signature_pkey" CONTEXT: PL/pgSQL function "update_sen_sig" line 16 at SQL statement PL/pgSQL function "rule_header_add" line 26 at perform I thought it might be caused by duplicated data. But ... cews=> insert into rule_header values (268,1,'alert','ip','$EXTERNAL_NET','any','$HOME_NET','any','->','dos.rules',3,current_timestamp,0); INSERT 29393 1 And cews=> insert into sensor_signature values (-1,268); INSERT 29394 1 That commands work perfectly. Could somebody tell me why and how to solve this. Thanks. Azmi