Re: Big problem - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject Re: Big problem
Date
Msg-id 40B20EA6.8090207@familyhealth.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Big problem  (Dennis Bjorklund <db@zigo.dhs.org>)
Responses Re: Big problem
List pgsql-hackers
> Isn't it just enough to prevent the user with userid 1 from losing the 
> superuser status. If one want to allow it one could prevent it just when 
> doing the ALTER USER stuff and allow it when editing pg_shadow directly. 
> Or maybe have some guc variable that write locks the user with id 1.

That gets my vote - can't take superuser off id 1...

> Given that it was so "simple" to restore I'm not sure if it's worth it or 
> not, but restricting just user 1 does not give any of the problems you 
> wrote about.

Well, sergio sure wasn't very happy...

And if I ever get around to my patch that separates out superuser and 
catalog modification privileges, superusers will no longer necessarily 
be able to 'delete from pg_proc';

Chris



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dennis Bjorklund
Date:
Subject: Re: Big problem
Next
From: Manfred Koizar
Date:
Subject: Re: zero-column table behavior