Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> Tom appears to be against, everyone else seems to be for ... should we try
> it and see how it works out?
Sure, although I personally think Andrew's suggestion of creating a
separate (non-archived) list that includes the full diff is the best
solution. That satisfies both of Tom's gripes: it is "bulky", yes, but
those who are against "bulkiness" can just subscribe to the old list,
and it won't bloat the size of the list archives.
-Neil
