Peter Eisentraut wrote:<br /><blockquote cite="mid200405180857.08504.peter_e@gmx.net" type="cite"><pre wrap="">Joshua
D.Drake wrote: </pre><blockquote type="cite"><pre wrap="">Uhhh?? Are you ripping out all core pls then? plPerlNG is
supposedto
replace plPerl, I was talking with Bruce and he seemed to think that
(as long as the code was good enough) that we could incorporate
plPHP??? </pre></blockquote><pre wrap="">
One reason against including plPHP in the core would be that it would
create a circular build dependency between the packages postgresql and
php. I think we should rather avoid that. </pre></blockquote> It is no different that the dependency between plPerl
andPerl, plPython and Python or worse<br /> plTCL and TCL (which typically isn't installed anymore).<br /><br />
Sincerely,<br/><br /> Joshua D. Drake<br /><br /><pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:jd@commandprompt.com">jd@commandprompt.com</a> - <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"href="http://www.commandprompt.com">http://www.commandprompt.com</a>
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL</pre>
