>a release, etc ...
>
>I'd almost say that time would be better spent on coming up with an
>effective upgrade method so that upgrading to new releases is easier ...
>
>Please note that I'm not against the backporting, but do understand the
>arguments against it in terms of time and manpower ...
>
>
I believe they are valid arguments too and if we were to do it we would
definately need to be
selective about "which" features get back ported but forward movement
can be in the present
tree as well.
Joshua D. Drake
>----
>Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
>Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
>
>
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL
