Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Uhhh?? Are you ripping out all core pls then? plPerlNG is supposed to
> replace plPerl, I was talking with Bruce and he seemed to think that
> (as long as the code was good enough) that we could incorporate
> plPHP???
One reason against including plPHP in the core would be that it would
create a circular build dependency between the packages postgresql and
php. I think we should rather avoid that.
