Re: SPI and bytea columns - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mike Mascari
Subject Re: SPI and bytea columns
Date
Msg-id 40A12BC1.2090305@mascari.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to SPI and bytea columns  ("Wolfgang Reichart" <wolfgang_reichart@hotmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Wolfgang Reichart wrote:

> hello!
>    i want to insert jpeg pictures into a bytea field and i implemented a 
> SPI extension. this function reads the jpeg-file from the filesystem, 
> converts it into a octal-coded string to pass the sql-parser, and then 
> exec's the insert statement. this is rather slow, and i'd like to insert 
> using lower level postgres functions that handle binary data without 
> base64- or escaped en-/decoding.
> 
> did anyone something like this in the past?

Does it necessarily have to be stored in a bytea field? Why not 
create your own type (CREATE TYPE) with utility functions to read 
the image file from disk?

PostgreSQL really needs a maintained type library as a single 
project where people can contribute types, functions, operators, and 
aggregates, such as the recently discussed email type.

Mike Mascari

<joke>
Just be sure not to actually compress/decompress the JPEG or you 
might get sued:

http://www.technewsworld.com/perl/story/33518.html
</joke>





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Hallgren
Date:
Subject: Module dependency on PostgeSQL version
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Probably security hole in postgresql-7.4.1