Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
>
>>Wow, you can reference different column as part of the alter column.
>
>
> Yeah, the USING is actually any arbitrary expression over the old table
> row. (Getting that to work was a tad tricky...) So you can view this
> as a full-table UPDATE operation that folds in possible column type changes.
Does that mean I'll want to disable triggers while I do this? Actually,
if the structure's changing I presume I'll want to drop/recreate my
triggers anyway (even if they get reparsed like view definitions).
-- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd
