Bruce Momjian wrote:
>+ if (toupper(*src) != toupper(*src))
>
>
Shouldn't this be
if (toupper(*src) != toupper(*dst))
?
For completeness, you should probably also check for network drive paths ("\\machine\sharename\foo").
I also think we should just canonicalise everything early, and then never have to worry about / vs \ again.
I must confess I think this scheme is overkill - I can't think of a use case where one would want a relocatable
installationwhich would any pattern other than the one we are thinking of for the windows binary installer. Are we
takingflexibility too far?
cheers
andrew