Tim Conrad wrote:
>On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 10:39:52AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
>
>>Tim, Folks:
>>
>>
>>>I guess there's a perception that we are "above" the marketeering of MySQL
>>>and Microsoft, where features are promised as much as 6 years before they
>>>appear, or are heavily publicized while still in alpha. So the most you'd
>>>be likely to get the community to commit to is maintaining a list of
>>>easy-to-read "Major Features in Development".
>>>
>>>
>>Actually, I really like this idea. It could go like:
>>
>>Feature Lead Status
>>Improved Memory Use Jan Wieck Complete, Committed for 7.5
>>HA M-S Replication Jan Wieck Alpha testing
>>PITR Simon Riggs Early Development
>>Tablespaces Gavin Sherry Late Development
>>Integrated pg_autovacuum Matthew O'Con. Planning
>>Server Clustering None Developer Needed
>>etc.
>>
>>As well as giving the press something to look at, this would give programmers
>>and corporate sponsors an idea of where their time/money would be of use.
>>And it could put to bed the myth that we're not constantly improving.
>>
>>
>
>This suggestion would be good. Something that's not super-detailed
>and not super-technical. Also stuff that's on the 'todo' list that
>is certianly long-range goals as well - just so people are aware
>that it's something that the 'group' is aware of as well as a need.
>
>
>
The big issue I see with this is maintenance. Ideally, it would be
handled in a DB-driven web app and maybe even tied to the TODO (when an
item is listed as committed, the item gets the leading - in the TODO?).
I would be happy to contribute programming time, but I would need to
leave the maintenance to others.
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
