Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jan Wieck
Subject Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions
Date
Msg-id 4089053A.9030009@Yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions  (Fabien COELHO <fabien.coelho@ensmp.fr>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:

> The specific details aren't especially relevant to this thread, though.
> What is relevant is that we agree to a commitment that we will make
> it easy to build modules outside the current Postgres build environment,
> and that we will have an ongoing commitment to make sure that that keeps
> working.

Agreed.


Jan

-- 
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: What can we learn from MySQL?
Next
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions