Re: Summary and Plan for Hot Standby - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Stark
Subject Re: Summary and Plan for Hot Standby
Date
Msg-id 407d949e0911150647i48e82931va48a997a366c6b09@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Summary and Plan for Hot Standby  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Summary and Plan for Hot Standby
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> - The "standby delay" is measured as current timestamp - timestamp of
>> last replayed commit record. If there's little activity in the master,
>> that can lead to surprising results. For example, imagine that
>> max_standby_delay is set to 8 hours. The standby is fully up-to-date
>> with the master, and there's no write activity in master.  After 10
>> hours, a long reporting query is started in the standby. Ten minutes
>> later, a small transaction is executed in the master that conflicts with
>> the reporting query. I would expect the reporting query to be canceled 8
>> hours after the conflicting transaction began, but it is in fact
>> canceled immediately, because it's over 8 hours since the last commit
>> record was replayed.
>
> An issue that will be easily fixable with streaming, since it
> effectively needs a heartbeat to listen to. Adding a regular stream of
> WAL records is also possible, but there is no need, unless streaming is
> somehow in doubt. Again, there is work to do once both are in.

I don't think you need a heartbeat to solve this particular case. You
just need to define the "standby delay" to be "current timestamp -
timestamp of the conflicting candidate commit record".


--
greg


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Summary and Plan for Hot Standby
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Summary and Plan for Hot Standby