I deal with such things on a fairly regular basis. If you want an extra
set of eyes or to chat about who/what/how is causing the ddos and an
extra opinion on what can be done about it, let me know offlist :)
Gavin
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>On Tue, 30 Mar 2004, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
>
>
>>Marc,
>>
>>
>>
>>>Well, we can always add in a hearty hello to the US CIA(?) by adding
>>>mention that DDoS attacks are a form of terrorism that hurts the US ppl
>>>more then anyone else, as it affects more sites in the US then the rest of
>>>the world ... maybe we can get some of that anti-terrorism money invested
>>>in electronic terrorism?
>>>
>>>
>>Hey, make up your mind. First you make fun of use Americans for our
>>"new Red Scare" and then you want to give the CIA an excuse to go after
>>hackers?
>>
>>
>
>me, was just rambling ... personally, what I'd like to see (or find) is
>some sort of organized movement amongst ISPs themselves to combat the
>problem ... from my scan of Google this morning, apparently there are
>several things that ISPs *can* do to reduce/prevent the occurance of DDoS
>attacks, or, at least make it more difficult to do, but most don't ...
>
>For instance, how many ISPs out there have anti-spoofing enabled in their
>routers, which, from what I've read, is the biggest thing that a
>cyber-terrorist uses in their DDoS attacks. I know when I worked at the
>University, *I* had to explain to the network manager that our router even
>supported such a thing :(
>
>I guess the biggest nightmare as far as tracking down DDoS attacks is the
>attacks come from spoof'd IPs, so without *alot* of work involving
>upstreams, narrowing down where the attack is coming from is near
>impossible :(
>
>----
>Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
>Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
>
>
