Re: BUG #16927: Postgres can`t access WAL files - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: BUG #16927: Postgres can`t access WAL files
Date
Msg-id 4065519.1616166832@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #16927: Postgres can`t access WAL files  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: BUG #16927: Postgres can`t access WAL files  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-bugs
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> There was a typo in one of my previous messages.  What I was referring
> to is aaa3aedd.

Ah, I was just about to ask what the heck aaaef7a referred to.

Given the evidence that there's a problem, I agree with reverting
that.  I'd suggest keeping the cosmetic rename of the function,
but we have to put back the Windows-doesn't-HAVE_WORKING_LINK logic.

Grepping in the v12 branch, I find a second use of HAVE_WORKING_LINK
in contrib/pg_standby.  But that seems to be in a non-WIN32 code path,
so I don't think putting that back is necessary.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Ярослав Пашинский
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #16927: Postgres can`t access WAL files
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #16927: Postgres can`t access WAL files