Tom Lane wrote:
>>Another
>>is that the setting of vacuum_mem (in postgresql.conf) limits the amount of
>>cleanup that vacuum can do.
>
> This is completely untrue. Increasing vacuum_mem will likely make
> things faster on large tables (by avoiding the need for multiple passes
> over the indexes). It will not change the end result though.
My mistake then.
Was this true for some previous version? I could have swore I read somewhere
that vacuum_mem had to be set high enough or vacuum wouldn't be able to clean
everything up (aside from anything locked in transactions). Now that I'm
looking, I can't find any such reference, so perhaps I misunderstood and
twisted the meaning.
Is performance the only reason for increasing vacuum_mem?
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
