Greg Stark wrote:
> Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com> writes:
>
>> the point is that PostgreSQL is no GNU product, never has been and if someone
>> intends to he shall do so after yanking out the contributions I made.
>
> Note that when you released your contributions you did so under a license that
> imposed no such conditions. If Microsoft wanted to release a Microsoft
> Postgresql under a completely proprietary license they would be free to do so.
> Likewise if someone wanted to release a GPL'd "GNU Postgresql" they could do
> it. And nobody could force either to yank anyone's code.
I released my contributions under the BSD license. A license change is
only possible when accepted by the Copyright holder. I might have missed
something, but when did Microsoft get the Copyright of my code?
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
