Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Sabino Mullane
Subject Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch
Date
Msg-id 404c0f98ef0f040c4d122803c5b766e8@biglumber.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160


> In thinking last night, I am now wondering if a letter is really the
> right symbol for this.  We already have letter flags which control
> object type selection, but the system table addition is kind of
> independent of those flags, like '+' now.  I am thinking maybe '&' is
> the right symbol rather than 'A' or 'S'.

What problem are we trying to solve here that is not already solved by
using 'S' for system tables, which has been in use in psql for over a
decade now?

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
End Point Corporation
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200901201026
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAkl17psACgkQvJuQZxSWSsjdRACgoAJPOBsWYPf420KLl/7tuPTa
By0AoORZBVnszD5SmGUpKvBHR7YFES7r
=AILx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch
Next
From: Dimitri Fontaine
Date:
Subject: Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch