Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> OK, I think we are doing this backwards. Instead of adding '@' to
> global users, and then removing it in the backend, why don't we have
> local users end with '@', that way, global users continue to connect
> just as they have before, and local users connect with @, so dave@db1
> connects as 'dave@' and if he has other database access, he can use the
> same 'dave@' name.
No, *that* would be backwards. In installations that are using this
feature, the vast majority of the users are going to be local ones.
And the global users will be the presumably-more-sophisticated admins.
Putting the onus of the '@' decoration on the local users instead of
the global ones is exactly the wrong way to go.
regards, tom lane
