Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Date
Msg-id 4046b275-bb0c-9bdb-2ab6-ed87a19bd686@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 2/11/22 15:47, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 3:40 PM Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>> I'm not really sure any single parameter name is going to capture the
>> subtlety involved here.
> I mean to some extent that's inevitable, but it's not a reason not to
> do the best we can.


True.

I do think we should be wary of any name starting with "LOG", though.
Long experience tells us that's something that confuses users when it
refers to the WAL.


cheers


andrew


--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Merging statistics from children instead of re-sampling everything