Re: Hiding a GUC from SQL - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Laurenz Albe
Subject Re: Hiding a GUC from SQL
Date
Msg-id 402717b9aa9ef43ac6f3ebd57253317542f8b513.camel@cybertec.at
Whole thread Raw
In response to Hiding a GUC from SQL  (Michel Pelletier <pelletier.michel@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Hiding a GUC from SQL
Re: Hiding a GUC from SQL
List pgsql-general
On Wed, 2020-06-17 at 13:23 -0700, Michel Pelletier wrote:
> In my extension pgsodium I'm defining a custom variable at startup to store a key:
> 
> https://github.com/michelp/pgsodium/blob/master/src/pgsodium.c#L1107
> 
> I'm using the flags GUC_NO_SHOW_ALL | GUC_NO_RESET_ALL | GUC_NOT_IN_SAMPLE | GUC_DISALLOW_IN_FILE,
> and a custom "no show" show hook that obscures the value.  This idea was inspired from the
> pgcryptokey module from Bruce Momjian.
> 
> The value cannot be shown either with SHOW or current_setting() and it does not appear in pg_settings.
>  From what I can tell, the value is inaccessible from SQL, but I think it's worth asking
> the experts if there is some other demonstrable way, from SQL, that this value could be
> leaked even to a superuser.  no sql level user should be able to see this value, only a C function,
> like the pgsodium_derive() from which to derive other keys, should be able to see it.
> I realize that someone with external process access can get the key, my  goal is to prevent
> accessing it from SQL.
> 
> Any thoughts on weaknesses to this approach would be welcome.  Thanks!
> 
> -Michel

A superuser can access files and start programs on the server machine.

A dedicated superuser may for example attach to PostgreSQL with a debugger
and read the value of the variable.

And if that doesn't work, there may be other things to try.

It is mostly useless to try to keep a superuser from doing anything that
the "postgres" operating system user can do.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe
-- 
Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com




pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Laurenz Albe
Date:
Subject: Re: Conflict with recovery on PG version 11.6
Next
From: Laurenz Albe
Date:
Subject: Re: autovacuum failing on pg_largeobject and disk usage of thepg_largeobject growing unchecked