Re: Contents of pg_listener linger? - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Jeff Boes
Subject Re: Contents of pg_listener linger?
Date
Msg-id 4023BE4F.4030007@nexcerpt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Contents of pg_listener linger?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-admin
Tom Lane wrote:

>Jeff Boes <jboes@nexcerpt.com> writes:
>
>
>>What causes the contents of pg_listener to "linger" long past the lifespan of
>>the associated database backend? My table has rows that I know must be days old.
>>
>>
>
>PG version?
>
>
>
7.3.4

>In any case, if there is a row for a dead backend it should be removed
>the first time someone tries to "notify" that condition name and
>discovers that he can't signal the dead backend.  If you've got days-old
>dead rows they must be for very-infrequently-notified conditions.
>
>            regards, tom lane
>
>
Yup, that seems to be the case. When I "NOTIFY" these, they disappear.
Any other way to clean them up?  The problem is that there's one legit
listener, and umpteen dead ones. I can rig up something to notify all
these but I have to make sure that the legit listener is offline.

--
Jeff Boes                                      vox 269.226.9550 ext 24
Database Engineer                                     fax 269.349.9076
Nexcerpt, Inc.                                 http://www.nexcerpt.com
           ...Nexcerpt... Extend your Expertise


pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Contents of pg_listener linger?
Next
From: hal
Date:
Subject: HELP: optimizing shared mem