> I can't see any way to handle parameterized types without extending the
> grammar individually for each one --- otherwise it's too hard to tell
> them apart from function calls. That makes it a bit hard to do 'em
> as plug-ins :-(. The grammar hacks are certainly ugly though, and if
> someone could think of a way, I'm all ears...
Disallow it in table definitions, but allow it in domain definitions...
Chris
