Re: PGBench on Windows - connections are subprocesses? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: PGBench on Windows - connections are subprocesses?
Date
Msg-id 401420.1595252290@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to PGBench on Windows - connections are subprocesses?  (Durumdara <durumdara@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: PGBench on Windows - connections are subprocesses?
List pgsql-general
Durumdara <durumdara@gmail.com> writes:
> But the number of threads option (j I think) confused me. At first I
> thought the total connection number is simply the multiplication of c and j
> (subconnections).
> As I saw this is untrue.

> So I don't know how this utility works really in the background.

There are -j threads in the pgbench process, and -c connections to
the server (hence -c backend processes on the server side).  Each
of the pgbench threads is responsible for sending queries to a subset
of the connections.  Setting -j more than -c is useless (I forget
if it's actually an error).  If you set -j to, say, half of -c then
each thread has exactly two connections to manage.  If -j is too
small compared to -c then pgbench itself tends to become the bottleneck.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: Steps required for increasing disk size in EC2 instance with minimal downtime
Next
From: Durumdara
Date:
Subject: Re: PGBench on Windows - connections are subprocesses?