Re: Weird test mixup - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrey M. Borodin
Subject Re: Weird test mixup
Date
Msg-id 400510C8-AE7F-4FF6-BAC2-7E4BB4D01DB4@yandex-team.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Weird test mixup  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: Weird test mixup
List pgsql-hackers

> On 18 Mar 2024, at 06:04, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> new function call injection_points_local() that can
> be added on top of a SQL test to make it concurrent-safe.

Maybe consider function injection_points_attach_local(‘point name’) instead of static switch?
Or even injection_points_attach_global(‘point name’), while function injection_points_attach(‘point name’) will be
global?This would favour writing concurrent test by default… 


Best regards, Andrey Borodin.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: pg16: XX000: could not find pathkey item to sort
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Switching XLog source from archive to streaming when primary available