Hi!
Josh Berkus wrote:
>>What is the justification for this policy?
>
>
> As I recall, because the WWW team wants to stay narrowly focused on WWW
> development without tangental discussions (seriously). Also because many
> things regarding the stucture of the site and hosting, which could give an
> attacker useful information, are discussed there.
Sounds like lame excuses to me.
1) There was a wonderfully enlightening discussion why open development is
perfect for advocacy in this list recently.
2) The list has PUBLIC ARCHIVES, for Gods' sake!
