Re: LWLock/ShmemIndex startup question - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Manfred Spraul
Subject Re: LWLock/ShmemIndex startup question
Date
Msg-id 4004260B.6060704@colorfullife.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: LWLock/ShmemIndex startup question  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:

>Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com> writes:
>  
>
>>What are the chances for Win64 support? sizeof(unsigned long) remains 4, 
>>sizeof(void*) is 8.
>>    
>>
>
>If you can tell me what type Datum should be (unsigned long long
>maybe?), we could probably handle that.
>
Probably uintptr_t: That's the official C99 integer type for storing 
pointers. I'm not sure if it's guaranteed to be wide enough for 
ULONG_MAX (or only UINT_MAX).

--   Manfred



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: LWLock/ShmemIndex startup question
Next
From: "Mark Cave-Ayland"
Date:
Subject: Re: Suggestions for analyze patch required...