Re: [HACKERS] Re: PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Charles Tassell
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL
Date
Msg-id 4.3.2.7.2.20001115174923.00ba0a40@mailer.isn.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL  ("Adam Lang" <aalang@rutgersinsurance.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Re: PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL
List pgsql-general
Just a note, I've been using Postgres 7.02 and PHP 4.02 or 4.03 for about a
month in a couple sites, and haven't experienced any problems with
persistent connections.  Problem might have been fixed in one of the point
releases, or maybe I just don't have enough different db connections to
trigger it.


At 02:05 PM 11/15/00, Adam Lang wrote:
>PHP 4 was having problems with persistent connections (not sure if with just
>pgsql or all dbs).  Maybe that is why they didn't use it.
>
>Adam Lang
>Systems Engineer
>Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <joseph@randomnetworks.com>
>To: "carl garland" <carlhgarland@hotmail.com>
>Cc: <martin@math.unl.edu.ar>; <RDNELSON@co.centre.pa.us>;
><davidb@vectormath.com>; <mfork@toledolink.com>; <poulc@cs.auc.dk>;
><pgsql-general@postgresql.org>; <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
>Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 12:28 PM
>Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL
>
>
> >
> > On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, carl garland wrote:
> >
> > # >perhaps why, even at 5 clients, the page views he shows never went
> > # >significantly above 10/sec?
> > #
> > # I think alot of it has to do with the web server/db setup not pg.  They
>are
> > # using Apache/PHP and looking at their code every page has the additional
> > # overhead of making the db connection.  Now if they had used AOLserver
>with
> > # its persistent db connecction pooling scheme they may have faired better
>;)
> >
> > I haven't actually looked at their code they used to test with to
> > see if they are actually using it, but Apache/PHP has the ability to do
> > persistent db connections.  I would be surprised that someone like Tim (
> > who seems to have done a fair bit of php with db stuff) would not make use
> > of such a feature.
> >
> > If you can point out an example of where they are not using this
> > feature I will gladly stand corrected.
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > | Joseph Scott                       The Office Of Water Programs  |
> > | joseph@randomnetworks.com          joseph.scott@owp.csus.edu     |
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Philip Hallstrom
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] [RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENT] v7.0.3 *Final* now Available
Next
From: Dave Larson
Date:
Subject: AIX 4.3.3 and postgresql 7.0.3