On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 1:33 AM, Peter Geoghegan
<peter.geoghegan86@gmail.com> wrote:
> Why hasn't libpq had keepalives for years?
I guess that it's because keepalive doesn't work as expected
in some cases. For example, if the network outage happens
before a client sends some packets, keepalive doesn't work,
then it would have to wait for a long time until it detects
the outage. This is the specification of linux kernel. So
a client should not have excessive expectations of keepalive,
and should have another timeout like QueryTimeout of JDBC.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
