On 2020/01/21 13:39, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 08:45:14AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
>> The original email doesn't say so. I might be missing something, but
>> can you explain what makes you think so.
>
> Oops. Incorrect thread, I was thinking about this one previously:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/822113470.250068.1573246011818@connect.xfinity.com
>
> Re-reading the root of the thread, I am still not sure what we could
> do, as that's rather tricky. See here:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20190927061414.GF8485@paquier.xyz
The original proposal, i.e., holding the interrupts during
the truncation, is worth considering? It is not a perfect
solution but might improve the situation a bit.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NTT DATA CORPORATION
Advanced Platform Technology Group
Research and Development Headquarters
