Re: About partitioning - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Vincenzo Romano
Subject Re: About partitioning
Date
Msg-id 3eff28921001200257x14cffce7v5e2dc121713eca64@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: About partitioning  (Adrian von Bidder <avbidder@fortytwo.ch>)
Responses Re: About partitioning  (Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman@gmail.com>)
Re: About partitioning  (Adrian von Bidder <avbidder@fortytwo.ch>)
List pgsql-general
2010/1/20 Adrian von Bidder <avbidder@fortytwo.ch>:
> Hi,
>
> [ creating db partitions on demand ]
>
> On Wednesday 20 January 2010 11.20:21 Vincenzo Romano wrote:
>> In case 1 I need to inspect the catalog with at least a select, while
>> in case 2 I need to trap errors.
>> In my (little) experience trapping errors is slow, so I would go for
>>  option 1.
>
> Trapping/handling the error might be slow, but remember that creating a new
> partition (presumably) doesn't happen often (and creating the partition is
> slow anyway.)  In case 1 (check if the partition exists before insert),
> *every* *single* *insert* is slower because you first query the catalog,
> while in case 2, the normal case (insert into existing partition) is fast
> and only the rare case (how is your partitioning?  1000000 or more rows per
> partition on average?  I'd think it's quite a lot because why else partition
> the data at all...?) is slow.
>
> cheers
> -- vbi

Hmmm ... also trapping would happen for every single line being inserted ...

--
Vincenzo Romano
NotOrAnd Information Technologies
NON QVIETIS MARIBVS NAVTA PERITVS

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Kellerer
Date:
Subject: Re: Size of row-metadata?
Next
From: Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz
Date:
Subject: Re: About partitioning